Re: [indic] Re: Feedback on PR-104

• Previous message: Michael Everson: "[indic] Re: Feedback on PR-104"
• Maybe in reply to: N. Ganesan: "Re: [indic] Re: Feedback on PR-104"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 23:17 +0100 2007-08-19, Sinnathurai Srivas wrote:
>
> >>Simply said, there is no conjunct in Tamil. Why Unicode says
>there is conjunct in Tamil?
>
>Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote
>>Simply said, what you are saying is simply not correct.
>
>This then rolls back to the question of Grammar.

Please read what Peter Constable wrote more carefully.

-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

• Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: [indic] Re: Feedback on PR-104"
• Previous message: Michael Everson: "[indic] Re: Feedback on PR-104"
• Maybe in reply to: N. Ganesan: "Re: [indic] Re: Feedback on PR-104"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 19 2007 - 17:23:50 CDT