Re[2]: New brackets (6 new symbols)

From: Dmitry Turin (unicode20@narod.ru)
Date: Mon Oct 01 2007 - 10:37:57 CST

Next message: Dmitry Turin: "Re[2]: Brackets and integrals: behaviour of rasterizator"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"
Next in thread: Dmitry Turin: "Re[2]: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Maybe reply: Dmitry Turin: "Re[2]: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Reply: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Anto'nio,

>> because modern conceptual constructions are complex and consist from
>> repeated enclosures, and old brackets are not enough.

AnMTl> Unless one usess only a pair of bracket symbols, and nest them as many
AnMTl> times as nessed, like in everyday MSExcel formulae.
Excuse me, rephrase please.

Dmitry Turin
Unicode2 (2.1.1) http://unicode2.chat.ru
HTML6 (6.4.2) http://html60.chat.ru
SQL5 (5.4.0) http://sql50.chat.ru
Computer2 (2.0.3) http://computer20.chat.ru

Next message: Dmitry Turin: "Re[2]: Brackets and integrals: behaviour of rasterizator"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"
Next in thread: Dmitry Turin: "Re[2]: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Maybe reply: Dmitry Turin: "Re[2]: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Reply: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 01 2007 - 23:57:42 CST