Re: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)

From: Hans Aberg (haberg@math.su.se)
Date: Tue Oct 09 2007 - 07:27:28 CDT

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"

Previous message: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Emoticons"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 9 Oct 2007, at 00:08, Philippe Verdy wrote:

> So the question becomes really: What does a negated *regexp* match?

The link I gave suggested: the complement language.

Hans Åberg

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"
Previous message: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Emoticons"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Proposal for matching negated sets (was Re: New Public Review Issue: Proposed Update UTS #18)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 09 2007 - 07:30:49 CDT