Re: Emoticons

From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Mon Oct 15 2007 - 17:14:43 CDT

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "PCL (was RE: Use of interum PUA encodings for 85 letters)"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Use of interum PUA encodings for 85 letters"
Maybe in reply to: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Emoticons"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: Emoticons"
Reply: Hans Aberg: "Re: Emoticons"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> > The mere fact that a Unicode block named “Dingbats” exists is a mess.
>
> The next version of Unicode should explain WTF "ITC" is...

Q: WTF is ITC?

A: A font foundry. the TLA stands for International Typeface
Corporation. See: http://itcfonts.com

BYKT

--Ken

>
> > :-)
>
> ...okay, Google plus guessing might answer that question. <beg>
>
> Frank
>
> P.S. to Philippe, <beg> is no smiley, no ASCII art, and no dingbat.

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "PCL (was RE: Use of interum PUA encodings for 85 letters)"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Use of interum PUA encodings for 85 letters"
Maybe in reply to: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Emoticons"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: Emoticons"
Reply: Hans Aberg: "Re: Emoticons"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 15 2007 - 17:18:31 CDT