RE: Level of Unicode support required for various languages

From: Jonathan Rosenne ([email protected])
Date: Wed Oct 24 2007 - 15:46:32 CDT

Next message: Andrew West: "Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages"

Previous message: William J Poser: "Re: Use of acronyms (was RE: purl.net/net/cp)"
In reply to: James Kass: "Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of James Kass
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:38 PM
> To: Timothy Armes; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages
>
>
> Timothy Armes wrote,
>
> > 1) How many and which languages absolutely require the use
> > of combinging marks due to the fact there the pre-composed
> > glyphs aren't sufficient?
>

I object to the tone of the question. In several languages they are useful and desirable. Why should they be absolutely required?

Jony

Next message: Andrew West: "Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages"
Previous message: William J Poser: "Re: Use of acronyms (was RE: purl.net/net/cp)"
In reply to: James Kass: "Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 24 2007 - 15:47:57 CDT