Re: Ol Chiki character name typo?

From: Andrew West (andrewcwest@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 27 2007 - 12:07:33 CST

  • Next message: David Starner: "Re: Ol Chiki character name typo?"

    On 27/11/2007, David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > The documents mentioned on the first page seem to be missing from this
    > page; the last documents on the WG2 page are in the n35xx range,
    > whereas all the documents mention on the SC2 page are in the n39xx

    All ISO committees have their own n-numbers, so SC2 n-numbers are
    different from SC2/WG2 n-numbers, which are different from SC2/WG2/IRG
    n-numbers.

    > range, and there doesn't seem to be anything that looks like the
    > Egyptian documents I pointed to on the first page on this page.

    > > n3966, n3967, and n3968, the key documents for Egyptian hieroglyphics

    You have to use your own brain just a little bit.

    Looking at the SC2 registry, we see that two of the documents you
    refer to are explicitly cross-referenced to WG2 documents:

    N3966
    Towards a default deterministic ordering for Egyptian Hieroglyphs
    [WG 2 N 3308]

    N3967
    Proposal to encode Egyptian Hieroglyphs in the SMP of the UCS
    [WG 2 N 3237]

    You can find these and other related documents on the latest documents
    page <http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/latestdocs.html> or via the
    index table at the top of this page (NB each of the linked doc files
    also exists as an htm file). It's not rocket science.

    Andrew



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 27 2007 - 12:09:05 CST