From: David Starner (prosfilaes@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 04 2008 - 20:01:49 CST
On Jan 4, 2008 1:16 PM, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> In principle there are three choices (but not all of them may be
> available), and not all of them are equally desirable.
>
> 1) If the character is unquestionably already encoded, pick a different,
> but available glyph variant for it
> 2) Pick a different character, but one that is used for the same purpose
> elsewhere (e.g. an IPA or UPA character).
> 3) Pick something that is unrelated but looks close.
I think you missed an important one
4) Pick something that unambigiously identifies the character; e.g.
this character could be marked [Gj] or {Gj}, provided the brackets
weren't used elsewhere in the text.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 04 2008 - 20:03:29 CST