Re: Problem in Line breaking

From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven (asmodai@in-nomine.org)
Date: Sun Feb 24 2008 - 14:14:36 CST

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Problem in Line breaking"

Previous message: Satoshi Nakagawa: "Problem in Line breaking"
In reply to: Satoshi Nakagawa: "Problem in Line breaking"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Problem in Line breaking"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Problem in Line breaking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

おはようございます中川さん、

-On [20080224 19:34], Satoshi Nakagawa (snakagawa@infoteria.co.jp) wrote:
>IMHO, (U+3001) and (U+3002) should not be treated as CL. Because we cannot
>apply LB30 to them. They should be separated as a different class.

I would have to agree with the evidence as you present it. I will double
check it tomorrow myself as well.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/
Here's a mirror, there's a screen, on both ways you can get in...

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Problem in Line breaking"
Previous message: Satoshi Nakagawa: "Problem in Line breaking"
In reply to: Satoshi Nakagawa: "Problem in Line breaking"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Problem in Line breaking"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Problem in Line breaking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 24 2008 - 14:18:04 CST