Re: Invalid code points

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Sun May 31 2009 - 12:42:15 CDT

Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"

Previous message: Phillips, Addison: "RE: Invalid code points"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Invalid code points"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"
Reply: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:

> In particular, it would be great to know if the range U+0080, …,
> U+009F is invalid.

That bit is especially wrong. I can at least imagine why there might be
confusion about the noncharacters and surrogate code points, but not the
C1 controls.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"
Previous message: Phillips, Addison: "RE: Invalid code points"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Invalid code points"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"
Reply: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 31 2009 - 12:44:52 CDT