From: Mark Davis ☕ (mark@macchiato.com)
Date: Wed Feb 17 2010 - 12:22:19 CST
Our policy is not to encode characters without attested use. There are
occasionally exceptions, but one would have to provide a compelling case
that special treatment was required.
Clearly the Euro symbol was such a case!
Mark
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:49, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:
> Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix dot netcom dot com> wrote:
>
> On the contrary, Unicode has, on occasion, deliberately encoded characters
>> for which there was credible evidence of planned widespread future use.
>>
>
> Which ones, besides EURO SIGN?
>
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s Â
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 17 2010 - 12:24:08 CST