From: Arno Schmitt (arno@zedat.fu-berlin.de)
Date: Thu Feb 18 2010 - 01:09:22 CST
On 17.02.2010 17:24 Robert Abel wrote:
> Unicode encodes scripts, yet you propose to encode *sounds*
> that would then be, depending on font, mapped to *different* characters,
This made me wonder why
U+0386 is encoded as U+1FBB as well
... (seven capital vowel letters)
U+038F is encoded as U+1FFB,
U+0390 as U+1FD3 as well,
U+03CC as U+1F79 as well
...
Sorry, I know this is Bnicode prehistory.
But please give me a short answer or direct
me to an old document/discussion/FAQ
thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 18 2010 - 01:14:04 CST