From: N. Ganesan (naa.ganesan@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 28 2010 - 12:37:45 CDT
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:31 PM, JAGANADH G <jaganadhg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:50 PM, N. Ganesan <naa.ganesan@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> A question for linguists. In Indian scripts,
>> there is a sign called halanta
>> which is used to delete an
>> inherent vowel /a/ in an Indic syllable.
>>
>> For example, in any Indic script,
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virama
>>
>> A syllable with /a/ + Halant = A "pure" consonant (with /a/ "killed")
>> i.e.,
>> [ka] + Halant = [k]
>>
> It is wrong.
>
> [ka] - [a] = [k] not [ka] + [Halant] = [k]
>
> like wise
>
> [ka] - [a] + [i] = [ki]
>
>
yes. [halant] = - [a].
My question is: the Zeroing element (call it halant or -/a/)
a linguistic zero?
N. Ganesan
>
>
>> Usually, in early Brahmi, the halant "vowel-killer" sign is like a
>> macron
>> above any consonant syllable. In Tamil, halant is a dot (bindu) above
>> of on the side a syllable, which is same as bindu for zero
>> in Khmer inscriptions.
>>
>> My question: Can we call Indic Halanta (the "killer" of vowel,/a/)
>> a form/kind of "Linguistic Zero" of PaaNini?
>>
>> What is ment by "Linguistic Zero"?
>
>
>
> --
> **********************************
> JAGANADH G
> http://jaganadhg.freeflux.net/blog
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 28 2010 - 12:39:58 CDT