From: Jonathan Coxhead (jonathan@doves.demon.co.uk)
Date: Mon Jul 05 2010 - 14:55:07 CDT
Just curious ... Is there a free font anywhere that contains these
characters? Either in the PUA of a Unicode font or encoded somehow in an
8-bit font?
Thanks
Jonathan Coxhead
72 Rock Harbor Ln, Foster City CA 94404
+1-650-430-6564 (m)
On 2010-06-30 9:26 am, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
> A couple of very quick comments.
>
> > A special phenomenon of EPA is that the combination of upper and
> lower case letters is peculiar in EPA, and changes between the
> different EPA stages.
> The committee decided that any further special casing should be
> handled in CLDR, you'd want a proposal to that group. For that to be
> done, you'd need first to propose a BCP47 variant to indicate EPA
> English. This would all be done well after the encoding were accepted.
>
> > Thus, the preferred solution for these characters is to use
> variation sequences here.
> I don't think there is much need for this. Because the corpus is so
> small, users are likely to need special fonts anyway, and the forms
> are close enough in other fonts for legibility among users of EPA.
>
> > However, they are proposed as symbols (gc=So), not as digits (gc=Nl
> or gc=No), to prevent the impression that Unicode promotes any
> non-decimal number system, or that it standardizes the digits for any
> such system.
>
> They are perforce not Nd, because that is reserved for decimal.
> However, if the primary use is numbers, they should be No. (It isn't a
> matter of 'promotion'.)
>
> Mark
>
> — Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 06:23, Karl Pentzlin <karl-pentzlin@acssoft.de
> <mailto:karl-pentzlin@acssoft.de>> wrote:
>
> I have compiled a draft proposal to encode the English Phonotypic
> Alphabet (an extension of the Latin alphabet propagated from 1847 to
> at least 1888, to give English a "phonetic" spelling).
> The draft can be downloaded at:
> http://www.pentzlin.com/EPA_Proposal_Draft1.pdf (4.1 MB).
> The final proposal is intended to be submitted for the next UTC in
> August.
>
> Any comments are welcome.
> Especially, I like to know whether the way the "special casing" is
> handled is considered acceptable.
>
> - Karl Pentzlin
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 05 2010 - 15:03:09 CDT