RE: Why does EULER CONSTANT not have math property and PLANCK CONSTANT does?

From: Murray Sargent (murrays@exchange.microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Jul 28 2010 - 09:56:37 CDT

Next message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: Pashto yeh characters"

Previous message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: Pashto yeh characters"
In reply to: Alex Plantema: "Re: Why does EULER CONSTANT not have math property and PLANCK CONSTANT does?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Alex notes "Operands are not operators, e.g. in a+b, a and b are operands, + is an operator." I'm sure Karl Williamson knows that, but the mathematical alphanumerics also aren't operators and they nevertheless have the math property. We need to change the description of the math property to include all characters that are used primarily for math and the EULER CONSTANT is such a character.

Alex.

Next message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: Pashto yeh characters"
Previous message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: Pashto yeh characters"
In reply to: Alex Plantema: "Re: Why does EULER CONSTANT not have math property and PLANCK CONSTANT does?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 28 2010 - 09:58:20 CDT