Re: 00B7 vs. 2027

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Sat Sep 18 2010 - 14:43:21 CDT

  • Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: 00B7 vs. 2027"

    On 18 Sep 2010, at 20:23, Asmus Freytag wrote:

    > Why not use the character that was added to Unicode precisely for the purpose?

    Seems like that character needs an annotation, doesn't it?

    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 18 2010 - 14:45:32 CDT