Re: Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?

From: Markus Scherer ([email protected])
Date: Wed Nov 10 2010 - 16:07:04 CST

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?"

Previous message: Shawn Steele: "RE: Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?"
In reply to: Jim Monty: "Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Specifically for ASCII, a common term is "seven-bit ASCII".
markus

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?"
Previous message: Shawn Steele: "RE: Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?"
In reply to: Jim Monty: "Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Is there a term for strictly-just-this-encoding-and-not-really-that-encoding?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 10 2010 - 16:09:14 CST