Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro

From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven (asmodai@in-nomine.org)
Date: Mon Nov 29 2010 - 06:08:12 CST

Next message: Shawn Steele: "RE: Phishing and enforcing Confusables.txt"

Previous message: Shriramana Sharma: "Re: Telugu vs Kannada confusables"
In reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Next in thread: sowmya satyanarayana: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

-On [20101129 07:09], Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>Searching the web, you can find that this request resulted in a
>Technical Report, but as I wrote before, I don't know who implemented
>these recommendations, and if so, where and when.

C1x (n1516) has 6.4.5 which contains the following string literal prefixes:

u8, u, U, L

So at least any compiler going to claim c1x conformity will have to support
it. A long time in coming, but it's there for the feature list.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
With malice toward none; with charity for all...

Next message: Shawn Steele: "RE: Phishing and enforcing Confusables.txt"
Previous message: Shriramana Sharma: "Re: Telugu vs Kannada confusables"
In reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Next in thread: sowmya satyanarayana: "Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 29 2010 - 06:12:50 CST