Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Thu Dec 02 2010 - 15:19:26 CST

  • Next message: M.-A. Lemburg: "Re: Unihan number types and values"

    On 12/1/2010 12:34 PM, Markus Scherer wrote:
    > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
    > <asmodai@in-nomine.org <mailto:asmodai@in-nomine.org>> wrote:
    >
    > -On [20101129 07:09], Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com
    > <mailto:asmusf@ix.netcom.com>) wrote:
    > >Searching the web, you can find that this request resulted in a
    > >Technical Report, but as I wrote before, I don't know who implemented
    > >these recommendations, and if so, where and when.
    >
    > C1x (n1516) has 6.4.5 which contains the following string literal
    > prefixes:
    >
    > u8, u, U, L
    >
    > So at least any compiler going to claim c1x conformity will have
    > to support
    > it. A long time in coming, but it's there for the feature list.
    >
    >
    > C++0x has these too. See
    > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#New_string_literals
    > markus

    I've created a summary of this topic here:
    http://unicode.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=88&start=0

    with focus on the new data types and literals.

    A./



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 02 2010 - 15:26:01 CST