Re: CSUR Proposal: Tonal: U+E9D0 - U+E9EF

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Tue Dec 21 2010 - 19:32:40 CST

  • Next message: QSJN 4 UKR: "Re: coloured characters"

    While not personally a fan of this system, I don't see why this wouldn't
    be appropriate for CSUR.

    --
    Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
    RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
    To: <everson@evertype.com>; <cowan@ccil.org>; <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 13:06
    Subject: CSUR Proposal: Tonal: U+E9D0 - U+E9EF
    > After months now of usage, and a (small) community beginning adoption, 
    > I am
    > making the first formal proposal of the Tonal glyphs for the ConScript 
    > Unicode
    > Registry. Please note that while digits 0 through 8 share the decimal
    > equivalents, I decided to leave 'ko' (deci. 10, looks similar to '9') 
    > glyph as
    > its own character, since the decimal 9 may be rendered using a 
    > straight line
    > looping at the topic, while the Tonal 'ko' must always be rendered as 
    > a
    > flipped 'by' (6). For compatibility purposes, software may still 
    > choose to
    > interpret a '9' in a Tonal number as 'ko'.
    >
    > Proposed this an-th (1th) day of Anuary (1), in the year of Our Lord 
    > rasan,
    > laton, hu (7):
    > http://luke.dashjr.org/education/tonal/glyphs/CSUR.html
    >
    > Some fonts (including Luxi Sans and Console) with the proposed glyphs 
    > added:
    > http://luke.dashjr.org/education/tonal/glyphs/fonts/
    >
    > Draft keyboard map for a Tonal user:
    > http://luke.dashjr.org/education/tonal/keyboard/dvorak-tonal.png
    >
    > Educational materials (primarily for young children, NOT someone 
    > familiar with
    > decimal) using this proposed encoding can be found in the tree at:
    > http://luke.dashjr.org/education/tonal/
    >
    > Comments and constructive criticism welcomed.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Luke
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 21 2010 - 19:35:12 CST