From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Thu Jan 06 2011 - 15:58:02 CST
Steve Slevinski <slevin at signpuddle dot net> wrote:
> The Internet Draft is for reference. It should progress to an RFC.
What is the objective of publishing this as an RFC, if a Unicode
proposal is already being prepared? Text encodings used to be presented
in RFCs during the '80s and '90s, but that approach is much less common
today.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 06 2011 - 16:01:32 CST