From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Tue Mar 08 2011 - 15:25:28 CST
Ken Whistler <kenw at sybase dot com> wrote (converted to plain text):
> For example, suppose I needed, for some reason, the write the number
> 1927631 (base 10) expressed in base 360. The base 360 digits for that
> are 14, 314, and 191. I could then easily express the number as
> {{14},{314},{191}}_360
Or even:
{{14},{314},{191}}₃₆₀
thus further proving that existing Unicode characters, without markup,
are sufficient.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 08 2011 - 15:28:08 CST