Re: Encoding of invented items (from RE: Assigning a plane for mapping digits for many different bases)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Mar 10 2011 - 13:28:13 CST

  • Next message: Luke-Jr: "Re: Encoding of invented items (from RE: Assigning a plane for mapping digits for many different bases)"

    On 10 Mar 2011, at 15:29, Luke-Jr wrote:

    > While I agree that in this day and age, characters NOT being in Unicode is
    > itself a huge barrier to widespread adoption, I also feel the ConScript
    > Unicode Registry ( http://www.evertype.com/standards/csur/ ) could be a
    > reasonable middle-ground.

    For ConScripts.

    > The problem is that it seems to no longer be maintained-- last update back in 2008,

    I've been busy doing real work. Though I'll have something Seussian for it sometime soon.

    > and still missing any mention of the proposed Tonal encoding I submitted about 4 months ago using the E9D0-E9EF range.

    Oh. That wasn't a ConScript, so it was out of scope.

    > Maybe it's time for someone new to step up to maintaining it?

    No. Go get your own project. This one isn't for sale.

    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 10 2011 - 13:30:33 CST