Re: Character Identity and Font Selection

From: Andreas Prilop (prilop4321@trashmail.net)
Date: Wed Jun 08 2011 - 11:47:10 CDT

Next message: Otto Stolz: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"

Previous message: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"
In reply to: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"
Next in thread: Otto Stolz: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"
Reply: Otto Stolz: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, William_J_G Overington wrote:

>> I guess it is too late now to dis-unify the two quotation
>> marks discussed supra.
>
> My solution would be to define two new quotation marks,
> clearly distinguished each from the other

We already have them: U+201C and U+201F.
Test your fonts here:
http://www.user.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/quotation-marks.html

-- 
The schoolboys from Google Groups failed again:
http://groups.google.com/group/fr.test/browse_thread/thread/8ad6f1e8fbfefaec

Next message: Otto Stolz: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"
Previous message: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"
In reply to: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"
Next in thread: Otto Stolz: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"
Reply: Otto Stolz: "Re: Character Identity and Font Selection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 08 2011 - 11:50:24 CDT