RE: Original Aim of Unicode

From: Peter Constable <petercon_at_microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:23:35 +0000

You keep mentioning “Unicode Incorporate”; I know of no entity by that name.


Peter

From: tulasi [mailto:tulasird_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:32 PM
To: Shriramana Sharma
Cc: unicode_at_unicode.org; Marion Gunn
Subject: Re: Original Aim of Unicode

> I believe the unicode.org<http://unicode.org/> website answers these questions.
> After reading it, if you have specific questions about specific text on the website,
> you could ask for clarifications.

Could not find any link with answers.

Did you view any link?
If so can you please post?

Thanks,
Tulasi

From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa_at_gmail.com<mailto:samjnaa_at_gmail.com>>
Date: Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: Original Aim of Unicode
To: tulasi <tulasird_at_gmail.com<mailto:tulasird_at_gmail.com>>
Cc: unicode_at_unicode.org<mailto:unicode_at_unicode.org>

On 2011-Jun-12 18:31, tulasi wrote:
What is current objective of Unicode Incorporate?
This incorporate is registered in California and is a private company.
What is the current objective of Unicode Consortium?
What are the differences between both Unicode Incorporate and Unicode
Consortium?
Is Unicode Consortium a private company as well?

I believe the unicode.org<http://unicode.org/> website answers these questions. After reading it, if you have specific questions about specific text on the website, you could ask for clarifications.

--
Shriramana Sharma
Received on Thu Jun 16 2011 - 00:27:49 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 16 2011 - 00:27:54 CDT