Re: Sanskrit nasalized L

From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:57:19 +0530

On Monday 20 June 2011 12:54 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
> Here's a related text element:
> [cid:image001.png_at_01CC2E7B.B6DA0BA0]
> That’s another that the original Uniscribe implementation didn’t allow but that we’ve become aware of as needing to be supported.

Peter -- what sequence did you use to achieve this display,

LA + VIRAMA + CANDRABINDU + LA

or

LA + CANDRABINDU + VIRAMA + LA

I personally feel the former is the "correct" one but would like to hear
your views.

-- 
Shriramana Sharma
Received on Tue Jun 21 2011 - 11:30:39 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 21 2011 - 11:30:40 CDT