Re: Noticed improvement in the Code chart link http://www.unicode.org/charts/

On 10/13/2011 09:47 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> I'd like to have an opinion about why this chart (for example)
> describes two code points 09E4 and 09E5 as<reserved>, without
> assigning any glyph, but still associating them with other punctuation
> signs in another script. Are these positions permanently reserved for
> the case where specific danda signs would be later discovered and
> encoded specifically in this script ? OR are they really unassigned
> and usable for encoding later any other kind of character ?

They are for potential script-specific danda signs and closed to other
kinds of characters.

-- 
Shriramana Sharma