John Hudson said on Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:11:03PM -0400,:
> PUA isn't necessary, and a font technology that handles elements of
> complex script shaping by referencing PUAs isn't fundamentally any
> different from one that uses glyph names or another identifier and
> leaves the glyph unencoded.
Does one exist? Does it work? (we will leave out the acceptance /
popularity part).
I am getting a distinct sense of deja vu here. As I already pointed
out, this was discussed somewhere, and I was told almost exactly what
you said.
But nobody has named any font / OS / layout / rendering environment /
library / application whatever.
Obviously, I am an ignoramus. But my question remains - what
alternative to OpenType?
-- Mahesh T. Pai || It's not the software that's free; it's you.Received on Sat Nov 05 2011 - 05:22:26 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Nov 05 2011 - 05:22:29 CDT