Re: ASSAMESE AND BENGALI CONTROVERSY IN UNICODE STANDARD ::::: SOLUTIONS

From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 18:44:41 +0530

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Richard Wordingham
<richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On the contrary, doubling for (historical) retroflexion is a fairly
> clear convention.

Where, please? I have never heard of it. (But of course my knowledge
is limited.)

-- 
Shriramana Sharma

Received on Sun Jul 08 2012 - 08:16:38 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: ASSAMESE AND BENGALI CONTROVERSY IN UNICODE STANDARD ::::: SOLUTIONS"
Previous message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: ASSAMESE AND BENGALI CONTROVERSY IN UNICODE STANDARD ::::: SOLUTIONS"
In reply to: Richard Wordingham: "Re: ASSAMESE AND BENGALI CONTROVERSY IN UNICODE STANDARD ::::: SOLUTIONS"
Next in thread: Richard Wordingham: "Re: ASSAMESE AND BENGALI CONTROVERSY IN UNICODE STANDARD ::::: SOLUTIONS"
Reply: Richard Wordingham: "Re: ASSAMESE AND BENGALI CONTROVERSY IN UNICODE STANDARD ::::: SOLUTIONS"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: ASSAMESE AND BENGALI CONTROVERSY IN UNICODE STANDARD ::::: SOLUTIONS"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 08 2012 - 08:16:39 CDT