Eli Zaretskii <eliz_at_gnu.org> wrote:
|> For example, this mail is
|> written in an UTF-8 enabled vi(1) basically from 1986, in UTF-8
|> encoding («Schöne Überraschung, gelle?»
|
|No, it isn't:
|
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Oh, it's really terrible. I do have 'reply-in-same-charset' set,
so as to not trouble people with less sophisticated mailers, and
it seems the mailer maybe ignores the 'sendcharsets=utf-8' if the
same-charset ISO-8859-1 is sufficient to represent the content!
What a considerate mailer! So, for you
41744 S+ 0.0 1288 ttys004 9:29pm 0:00.06 nail -f &
41753 S+ 0.0 756.)ttys004 9:35pm 0:00.03 vi -c set sw=2 /tmp/RepfAbEB
and righteousness, this time without reply-in-same-charset and
encoding=8bit and i bet it comes out as UTF-8 on the other end:
«Böses Erwachen folgte pünktlich, prompt und ohne Verzögerung.»
(And, just in case -- the Google translation is a bit too rude.)
Steven
Received on Fri Jul 13 2012 - 15:10:12 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 13 2012 - 15:10:13 CDT