On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Naena Guru <naenaguru_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>There, my challenge stands 1. to show where I hurt Singhala by
> romanizing. 2. to show how romanized Singhala violates any standard in what
> specific way.
> 3. to show that romanized Singhala is inferior to Unicode Singhala in some
> unique way that no other implementation of a language on the computer
> displays.
I read all your posts in your font. Unfortunately, I don't read
Singhala, so I don't know what you said. Unfortunately, your system
offers no universally understood plain text way of stating whether the
text should be read in a Singhala font or a Latin font, so even if you
do send English text, I will still probably be unable to read it. You
can rest assured that my text is Unicode-conformant, so sufficient
information to display it is encoded in the plain text.
-- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.Received on Sun Jul 15 2012 - 17:56:18 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 15 2012 - 17:56:20 CDT