On 22 Aug 2012, at 18:05, Jameson Quinn wrote:
> I understand that from a professional Mayanist perspective, having glyphs for just the numbers without even the dates or any of the rest isn't attractive. And I also understand that in real petroglyphs, 1 and 2 (for instance) usually look more like ∪•∪ and •∪• than like the simplified • and •• that I'd suggest for the basic glyphs. But I can say confidently that there are audiences who would use these glyphs, certainly more than a lot of what's in Unicode.
Try it out in the PUA for a while.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Received on Wed Aug 22 2012 - 13:38:38 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 22 2012 - 13:38:39 CDT