>> Thank you; I haven't seen that particular dingbat used before and
>> thought that it might have an established meaning, e.g. like in
>> dictionaries where various symbols separate idiomatic (◊) or erroneous
>> (¶) uses.
>>
> Dictionaries have all sorts of interesting conventions. Not all
> characters needed for such conventions have been encoded - despite
> solid evidence for their use having been presented to the committee.
Why?
Stephan
Received on Fri Sep 07 2012 - 16:27:31 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Sep 07 2012 - 16:27:32 CDT