On 5/29/2013 9:38 AM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com
> <mailto:asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> In the case you give, the "new" design is clearly not the
> canonical shape, because it deliberately innovates. If it ever
> replaces the other sign in a majority of uses (not just in NYC)
> then perhaps updating the glyph might be appropriate.
>
> At this time, we are far from that point.
>
> That we are far from that point is clear to me; I was asking if there
> is a (semi-)formal definition of that point. What is "a majority of uses"?
>
I think Michael's answer covered that.
A./
Received on Wed May 29 2013 - 14:21:34 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 29 2013 - 14:21:35 CDT