On 21 Jun 2013, at 11:26, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl <lyratelle_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> Why not instead encoding a new combining "MARSHALLESE CEDILLA"
> that ought to be used with g, k, l, m, r and their uppercase counterparts?
Because then there would be tree confusable ways of writing all this data. N WITH COMMA BELOW (looks like comma below), N WITH CEDILLA (looks like comma below, N WITH MARSHALLESE CEDILLA (looks like cedilla). Alongside O WITH COMMA BELOW (looks like comma below), O WITH CEDILLA (looks like cedilla below, O WITH MARSHALLESE CEDILLA (looks like cedilla).
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Received on Fri Jun 21 2013 - 05:53:28 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 21 2013 - 05:53:29 CDT