> From: starback_at_stp.lingfil.uu.se (Per Starbäck)
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz_at_gnu.org>, "unicode\@unicode.org" <unicode_at_unicode.org>
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:37:57 +0100
>
> This is not about Emacs. Emacs was an example of a program that has use
> for character names, and has a harder job because of this strangeness.
> Too bad that (Emacs developer) Eli Zaretskii sees it as a rant against
> Emacs when I mention that this property of Unicode has led to
> longstanding (small) bugs there, but I think real examples are better
> than made-up ones.
What I saw as a rant is only this part (which was the only one I
quoted):
> > Emacs should do better regarding this
"Should do better" means it still doesn't, although it's expected to.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Wed Mar 12 2014 - 15:05:56 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Mar 12 2014 - 15:05:56 CDT