Re: Dead and Compose keys (was: Re: Romanized Singhala got great reception in Sri Lanka)

From: Andrew Cunningham <lang.support_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:42:51 +1100

Different individuals, groups and communities can bring their own
expectations to input layout designs.
Design is a balance between capabilities and limitations of the input
framework versus the expectations of the user community around how they
language should work.

I work with multiple operating systems and even more input frameworks.

I have my preferred input frameworks. But it ultimately air is a question
of knowing your tools.

For instance, if you compile a keyborad layout from the commandline with
MSKLC you can chain deadkeys, build against custom locales in Vista and
Win7, or build against unsupported language codes in Win8+

Andrew
On 19/03/2014 9:13 AM, "Tom Gewecke" <tom_at_bluesky.org> wrote:

>
> On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:52 PM, Andrew Cunningham wrote:
>
> I suspect it was a fishing expedition to illustrate how awkward it is to
> type on Unicode keyboard layouts versus his system.
>
>
> Interesting question perhaps. Is it more awkward to type 14 strokes as k
> a a r y y a a l a v a l a or to type 9 as ක ා ර ්‍ය ්‍ය ා ල ව ල ?
>
>

_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Tue Mar 18 2014 - 18:43:53 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 18 2014 - 18:43:54 CDT