On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:08:42 -0700
Leo Broukhis <leob_at_mailcom.com> wrote:
> The difference is real and intentional, but isn't it akin to the
> difference between (IIRC a discussion several years ago) the
> Polish/Czech acute and the French acute - the former is more
> vertical?
Not really. Look at the third entry at
http://www.helsinki.fi/~tasalmin/Forest_Nenets_short_i_1.jpg , where
the two occur side-by-side. Unification should depend on their being
contextual variants or one another, and difficult in laying down rules
is the justification for U+017F LATIN SMALL LETTER LONG S being a
separate character.
Richard.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Wed Jul 02 2014 - 17:45:34 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 02 2014 - 17:45:34 CDT