Re: Enconding a flammable sign and others (et al.)

From: Asmus Freytag (c) <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:12:48 -0700

On 9/6/2016 7:56 AM, Doug Ewell wrote:

As a reminder, "let's encode X" on the public mailing list doesn't
constitute a proposal, even for emoji. 
 
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

As a reminder, "X" is already encoded, so no proposal for encoding it would be accepted.

A./

Received on Tue Sep 06 2016 - 11:12:59 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Enconding a flammable sign and others (et al.)"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Enconding a flammable sign and others (et al.)"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: Enconding a flammable sign and others (et al.)"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Enconding a flammable sign and others (et al.)"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Enconding a flammable sign and others (et al.)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 06 2016 - 11:12:59 CDT