Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

From: Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:39:56 +0100

On 27 Mar 2017, at 05:58, James Kass <jameskasskrv_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Asmus Freytag wrote,
>
>> In the current case, you have the opposite, to wit, the text elements are unchanged, but you would like to add alternate code elements
>> to represent what are, ultimately, the same text elements. That's not disunification, but dual encoding.
>
> If spelling a word with an x+y string versus a z+y string represents two different spellings of the same word, then hand printing the same
> word with either an x/y ligature versus a z/y ligature also represents two different spellings of the same word.

Asmus also changes the terms of the discussion by introducing the vague and undefined term “text element”.

Michael Everson
Received on Mon Mar 27 2017 - 06:40:31 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 27 2017 - 06:40:31 CDT