Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

From: Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:02:00 +0100

On 27 Mar 2017, at 09:04, James Kass <jameskasskrv_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> John H. Jenkins mentioned early in this thread that these ligatures weren't used in printed materials and were not part of the official Deseret set. They were only used in manuscript.

Not quite true. Such detail will be for the proposal.

Michael
Received on Mon Mar 27 2017 - 08:02:21 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?"
In reply to: James Kass: "Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?"
Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 27 2017 - 08:02:21 CDT