On 3/27/2017 1:39 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> Note also that ISO3166-2 is far from being stable, and this could
> contradict Unicode encoding stability: it would then be required to
> ensure this stability by only allowing sequences that are effectively
> registered in
> http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/5.0/emoji-sequences.txt
> (independantly of the registration ins ISO3166-2), and nothing is said
> if ever ISO3166-2 obsoletes some codes and then some years later
> decide to reassign these codes to new entities: it should not be
> possible to do the same thing in Emoji sequences, and specific
> assignments will need to be made in the Unicode database.
>
These emoji tag sequences don't derive their stability from ISO 3166-2.
The emoji tag sequences depend on: CLDR Unicode Locale Identifiers, and
more specifically, for these subregions, on the unicode_subdivision_id:
http://unicode.org/reports/tr35/index.html#unicode_subdivision_id
And the data for that is here:
http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/tags/latest/common/validity/subdivision.xml
The stability for such tags is baked into the CLDR repository, as I
understand it.
By the way, if anybody is looking, Pomerania is there: "plpm" among the
4925 other valid unicode_subdivision_id values. So:
Flag of Pomerania = 1F3F4 E0070 E006C E0070 E006D E007F
But alas, that is not a *valid* emoji tag sequence (yet), so no soup
for you!
--Ken
Received on Mon Mar 27 2017 - 16:20:26 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 27 2017 - 16:20:27 CDT