Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation

From: Rebecca T <637275_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 17:09:55 -0400

> No chess symbols, encoded or proposed, are emoji, nor should they be.

Except on Samsung
<https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/94863/samsung-android-phone-rendering-chess-unicode-as-emoji>
.
Received on Sat Apr 01 2017 - 16:10:48 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kent Karlsson: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"
Previous message: Garth Wallace: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"
In reply to: Garth Wallace: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"
Reply: Garth Wallace: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Apr 01 2017 - 16:10:48 CDT