Where in the draft databases for Unicode 10.0 is Unicode 9.0 variation
sequence <U+0031, U+FE0E> declared legitimate? Without such a
declaration, a font that had a special glyph for <U+0031, U+FE0E> or
a substitution specific to <U+0031, U+FE0E, U+20E3 COMBINING ENCLOSING
KEYCAP> would not be Unicode compliant.
I hope this reflects my ignorance of the definition system rather than
an error in the databases.
Richard.
Received on Mon Apr 03 2017 - 16:13:20 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 03 2017 - 16:13:20 CDT