Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation

From: Michael Everson <>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 01:56:38 +0100

On 6 Apr 2017, at 01:53, Kent Karlsson <> wrote:
>> Oh, you misunderstood me. I knew it was raw HTML. I didn¹t expect it to render. But it was meaningless code.
> It was a response to Marcus, in that HTML might be used (with existing characters and no VSs) to format chess boards. And he is right, as proven by the HTML code I (basically) copied from stackoverflow.

Yes, I know this of course. (Well, whatever stackoverflow is.)

> And it does typeset better plain text chess boards à la your proposal…

Not with ordinary fonts and Unicode characters. And typographic care.
Received on Wed Apr 05 2017 - 19:56:52 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 05 2017 - 19:56:52 CDT