RE: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8

From: Shawn Steele via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 22:51:30 +0000

> Until TUS 3.1, it was legal for UTF-8 parsers to treat the sequence <C0 AF> as U+002F.

Sort of, maybe. It was not legal for them to generate it though. So you could kind of infer that it was not a legal sequence.

-Shawn
Received on Tue May 30 2017 - 17:51:46 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8"
Previous message: Karl Williamson via Unicode: "Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8"
In reply to: Karl Williamson via Unicode: "Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8"
Next in thread: Karl Williamson via Unicode: "Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 30 2017 - 17:51:46 CDT