Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)

From: Doug Ewell via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 12:54:45 -0700

Richard Wordingham wrote:

> even supporting 6-byte patterns just in case 20.1 bits eventually turn
> out not to be enough,

Oh, gosh, here we go with this.

What will we do if 31 bits turn out not to be enough?

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

Received on Thu Jun 01 2017 - 14:55:36 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)"
Previous message: Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode: "Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8"
Next in thread: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)"
Reply: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy via Unicode: "Re: Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)"
Reply: Martin J. Dürst via Unicode: "Re: Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)"
Maybe reply: William_J_G Overington via Unicode: "Re: Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)"
Maybe reply: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "RE: Running out of code points, redux (was: Re: Feedback on the proposal...)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 01 2017 - 14:55:37 CDT