Re: Normalise Tai Tham or not?

From: Eli Zaretskii via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 22:46:20 +0300

> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:00:12 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
>
> 4) The pressure on search tools to respect canonical equivalence is now
> relatively low. Some editors do (e.g. LibreOffice); others don't (e.g
> Emacs, so far as I am aware).

Emacs lately introduced character-folding in searches, but it's turned
off by default, as many users objected.
Received on Tue Oct 10 2017 - 14:47:01 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 10 2017 - 14:47:02 CDT