Anshuman Pandey wrote:
> I think it’s a good time to end this conversation. Whether ‘nonsense’ or not,
> emoji are here and they’re in Unicode. This conversation has itself become
> nonsense, d’y’all agree?
No. Other than the part about emoji being here and in Unicode.
> The amount of time that people have spent on this discussion could’ve been
> directed towards work on any one of the unencoded scripts listed at:
>
> http://www.linguistics.berkeley.edu/sei/scripts-not-encoded.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_work_and_no_play_makes_Jack_a_dull_boy
Received on Fri Feb 16 2018 - 01:25:02 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 01:25:02 CST