Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

From: James Kass via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:23:12 -0800

We'll probably never know which factors influenced the decision, but
apparently some kind of message got through.
Received on Tue Feb 20 2018 - 14:23:41 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Everson via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Previous message: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: metric for block coverage"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 20 2018 - 14:23:41 CST