Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

From: Philippe Verdy via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:11:37 +0100

2018-02-21 5:01 GMT+01:00 Anshuman Pandey via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>:

> > The good news is that the thread title question is moot.
>
> Yes, now let’s please return to discussing emoji.
>

Or NOT !!! This is NOT at all the same topic
Received on Tue Feb 20 2018 - 22:12:24 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Previous message: Anshuman Pandey via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
In reply to: Anshuman Pandey via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Next in thread: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 20 2018 - 22:12:24 CST